Jesse J. Camacho

Jesse J. Camacho

Partner, Practice Area Chair – Intellectual Property
Kansas City, MO
DOWNLOAD vCARD
  • BIOGRAPHY
  • EXPERTISE
  • BLOG/PRESS/MEDIA

ABOUT

Jesse is a seasoned patent litigator and litigation strategist with over 19 years of experience helping clients resolve or prevent intellectual-property disputes. He has represented clients ranging from startups to companies that rank among the top-ten most valuable in the world. Jesse has tried five Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) proceedings to completion, including arguing those IPR’s in person before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”). He has defended clients in Ex Parte Reexamination and Covered Business Method (“CBM”) Review proceedings. Jesse has also led teams at the appellate level, including arguing before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Jesse has represented clients in judicial districts throughout the country, including the Northern District of California,Central District of California, District of Delaware, Eastern District of Texas, Western District of Tennessee, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. He has appeared and argued before various judges, including Judge Lucy Koh, Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Judge Vince Chhabria, Judge Mary Thynge, Judge Jon McCalla, and Judge Philip Gutierrez.

Jesse has a reputation for effectively and efficiently advocating for clients whose technologies include armor panels, chemistry, cryptography, digital communications, digital security, emulsifications, imaging, encoding/decoding, encryption, two-factor authentication, and telecommunications. Beyond degrees in both computer engineering and electrical engineering, Jesse has an MBA that helps him appreciate the business aspects of conflict resolution and view situations from client perspectives.

ADMISSIONS

  • Missouri 2000
  • UPSTO 2002

LANGUAGE

  • English

EDUCATION

2000
University of Missouri-Columbia
J.D
2000
University of Missouri-Columbia
MBA
2015
Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
Masters of Divinity
1996
University of Missouri-Columbia
Electrical Engineering
Computer Engineering

AWARDS

Selected to deliver the baccalaureate address to the graduating law-school class of 2016 at the University of Missouri
at Kansas City (May 2016).

Former INROADS (https://inroads.org/) scholar.


FUN FACTS

FAVORITE QUOTE

Favorite Quote

Begin with the end in mind.

Stephen Covey
  • Favorite Book
    Favorite Book

    The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People

    by Stephen Covey

  • Favorite Movie
    Favorite Movie

    The Gospel of John

  • Favorite Vacation
    Favorite Vacation

    Israel

  • Favorite Meal
    Favorite Meal

    Tacos

ALTERNATE CAREER PATH

Alternate Carrer Path

If I weren’t a lawyer, I would be a teaching high school math, science (Physics), or Bible (at a private school).

ADMISSIONS

  • Missouri 2000
  • UPSTO 2002

LANGUAGE

  • English

EDUCATION

2000
University of Missouri-Columbia
J.D
2000
University of Missouri-Columbia
MBA
2015
Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
Masters of Divinity
1996
University of Missouri-Columbia
Electrical Engineering
Computer Engineering

AWARDS

Selected to deliver the baccalaureate address to the graduating law-school class of 2016 at the University of Missouri
at Kansas City (May 2016).

Former INROADS (https://inroads.org/) scholar.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Jesse worked exclusively in Shook, Hardy & Bacon’s Intellectual Property section for almost 20 years with his focus being on patent law. In the early part of his career, Jesse helped companies develop their patent portfolios (preparing or overseeing the drafting of hundreds of patent applications). He then transitioned to litigation and post-grant proceedings full time.

Jesse’s areas of expertise include:

Patent Litigation, Inter Partes Review (IPRs) Proceedings, Ex Parte Reexamination (EPRs) Proceedings, Covered Business Method (CBM), Reveiw Proceedings, Post Grant Reviews, and Intellectual Property Client Counseling.


REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS

Authentication/Notification (including two-factor or multifactor authentication):

Twilio v. TeleSign, U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Patent 7,945,034 B2 (“Assertions of obviousness levied in connection with a patented process for detecting fraudulent conduct based upon a user’s telephone number rejected by the Board”).

TeleSign v. Twilio, Central District of California, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,945,034 (“Process for determining characteristics of a telephone number”); and 8,462,920; 8,687,038; and 9,300,792 (“Registration, verification and notification system”) (also defend against three IPRs).

StrikeForce v. PhoneFactor and StrikeForce v. Microsoft, District of Delaware, U.S. Patent Nos.: 7,870,599; 8,484,698; and 8,713,701 (“Multichannel device utilizing a centralized out-of-band authentication system (COBAS)”).

SimpleAir v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,035,914 and 6,021,433 (“System and method for transmission of data”).

Cryptography/Encoding/Security:

Princeton Digital v. Microsoft, District of Delaware, U.S. Patent No. 4,813,056 (“Modified statistical coding of digital signals”)
Tallgrass v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas, Addison Fischer Patent Nos. 5,346,972; 6,141,423; 6,216,229 (“Method for preventing inadvertent betrayal by a trustee of escrowed digital secrets”).

Pantaurus v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas, U.S. Patent No. 6,272,533 (“Secure computer system and method of providing secure access to a computer system including a stand alone switch operable to inhibit data corruption on a storage device”).

Communications/Email/Imaging:

Comcast v. Sprint, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, U.S. Patent No. 5,991,271 (“Signal-to-channel mapping for multi-channel, multi-signal transmission systems”).

InNova v. Cinemark, Eastern District of Texas, U.S. Patent No. 6,018,761 (“System for adding to electronic mail messages information obtained from sources external to the electronic mail transport process”).

E-contact v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas, U.S. Patent No. 5,347,579 (“Personal computer diary”).

Skyline v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Virginia, U.S. Patent No. 7,551,172 (“Sending three-dimensional images over a network”).

Chemical:

Buckman v. Solenis, Western District of Tennessee, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,841,469 (“Chemical additives and use thereof in stillage processing operations”) and 8,962,059 (“Bio-based oil composition and method for producing the same”).

Buckman v. Nalco, Northern District of Illinois, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,949,432; 8,012,758; and 7,981,679 (“Method of monitoring microbiological activity in process streams”).

TALKS/SEMINARS

SEPTEMBER, 2018
The Domain of Blockchain, co-presented with Keith Bae, Secret Sauce IP BBQ CLE, Kansas City, Kansas
JUNE, 2016
Using Technology to Increase Your Efficiency, Annual Update on the Law
APRIL 2010
IP for Engineers, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
MARCH 2010
What IP Means to You, University of Missouri – Columbia
2010
Microsoft Women and Minority Law-Student IP Summit (Panelist), Austin, Texas
2008
Microsoft Women and Minority Law-Student IP Summit (Panelist), Washington, D.C.
DECEMBER 2009
Top-10 Claim-Drafting Tips, Post Bilski & In General, LAKC 2nd Annual IP CLE
OCTOBER 2009
What ‘CIA Agents’ and ‘Generalists Dealing with IP Issues’ Have in Common, Mid-America Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel
SEPTEMBER 2009
Revisiting Accelerated Examination, SHB, co-presented with Kelly Feimster
APRIL 2009
Top 10 Federal Circuit Decisions of 2008 (presented on two cases: Impax Labs & DDB Technologies), Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association
ANNUAL PRESENTATION
Everything You Wanted to Know About IP In About an Hour, Professor for a Day at University of Missouri – Columbia
MARCH 2005
You Have the Right to Remain Silent. Anything You Write In Your Patent Application Can, and Will, Be Used Against You, Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS & BOARD MEMBERSHIPS

Member of the Hispanic National Bar Association

CLERKSHIPS

Honorable John C. Holstein (Supreme Court of Missouri)

CONNECT WITH ME

At Practus, we handle complex and challenging legal matters. I look forward to talking to you about how we can best meet your goals.

CONTACT ME
triangle-pattern-right
Search Icon